To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3809
3808  |  3810
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:29:32 GMT
Viewed: 
4730 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>  <387CF961.42F012A7@cleanweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> James Brown wrote:
> 
> > Why is it that "government will take advantage of whatever power we give to
> > them" is a valid view, when at the same time, 'corporations will take
> > advantage of whatever power we give to them' is not?
> 
> I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have
> monopoly on the initiation of the use of force, while corporations are
> limited in what similar powers they can have, or so one would hope.

Yup, one would - and that is the current set-up.  But I believe(1) that I was
responding to an impression that governments are evil because they'll do this,
but corporations aren't, because they won't.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/

1:Started hunting through the thread for exact context, decided not to bother.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
<387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (27 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR