To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3809
3808  |  3810
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 18 Jan 2000 20:29:32 GMT
Viewed: 
2364 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
<387CF961.42F012A7@cleanweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James Brown wrote:

Why is it that "government will take advantage of whatever power we give to
them" is a valid view, when at the same time, 'corporations will take
advantage of whatever power we give to them' is not?

I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have
monopoly on the initiation of the use of force, while corporations are
limited in what similar powers they can have, or so one would hope.

Yup, one would - and that is the current set-up.  But I believe(1) that I was
responding to an impression that governments are evil because they'll do this,
but corporations aren't, because they won't.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/

1:Started hunting through the thread for exact context, decided not to bother.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
<387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR