 | | Re: Some auction pages just hurt your eyes.
|
|
He said... (...) limited to (...) single (...) I said... (...) listings (...) Buyers can (...) Someone else said... (...) True. (...) Also, true. Maybe they could put a little *annoying* gif next to the listing like *hot*, *gallery*, etc. -Rob. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) think (...) For things done while they were in power, sure. Although I'm not sure how statute of limitations should play in, though the only things which should have a statute of limitations are things for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) Yup, one would - and that is the current set-up. But I believe(1) that I was responding to an impression that governments are evil because they'll do this, but corporations aren't, because they won't. James (URL) hunting through the thread for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) :O We agree on a lot more than just that.. but the differences define us, so to speak. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) We've all got to stop *agreeing* like this or people will talk. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Heh :) I don't have anything against Mark though. Lurking in this newsgroup and listen to us prattle on argumentively about nothing is enough to drive *anyone* to a few chosen comments. We've probably been trolling him! Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) How did you arrive at that number? That's my point. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
<387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I would tend to say both are equally valid. However governments have monopoly on the initiation of the use of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Maybe we can lynch him with a wet noodle, thereby combining your sentiment and Richard's... Dave! (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) At last, an artistic sentiment that Richard and I can agree on! But lynching's a bit much, though. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) Good. Similarly, I hope that the experience of being lumped in with other less pleasant groups for your views will grant you some sympathy for, say, environmentalists, not all of which are "worship the earth as our godess" pagans. -- (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) The outrage! 50 lashes with a wet noodle. I don't care for his politics 100% but that man(? or whatever he is :-) ) has never been afraid to take chances artistically. Ziggy is on my 20 best albums of all time list. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) Any tax, across the board, incents some behaviours and disincents others. Broadly, there seem to be at least three classes of taxation, although there may be others. These are: Income - a tax on the production of wealth Sales - a tax on the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) In the interests of not repeating myself: (URL) I don't think individuals have (in the general case) enough resources for personal liability to be feasable/sufficient. An example of this occured recently in Alberta - a number of people were (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) This is turning into a lynch-mob! (...) Well in that case I'll find a sturdy branch.. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
|
|
(...) It could be further argued that learning about HTML by viewing source is like learning to write well by reading good books. It is not the content that is of interest when you view source (usually the content is better present when viewed (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) Does that responsibility follow them from job to job too? What about when they've retired? If the answer is 'no' to either of them, then I don't think that will work. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) There are two more, too: I found 3780, 3781, 3782, and 3783. Not to mention that he misquoted Bowie. Dave! (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
Since I guess this is partly my fault... (...) [snip] (...) Is it not a matter of scale? If I believed that you and they were both fascist-like but you were less so wouldn't I be as justified as you are by believing that they are at all? (Just to be (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
|
(...) That's two trolls I've spotted from you, timestamped within 32 minutes of each other. You might want to review the charter of the group. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
