To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *3801 (-20)
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) Good. Similarly, I hope that the experience of being lumped in with other less pleasant groups for your views will grant you some sympathy for, say, environmentalists, not all of which are "worship the earth as our godess" pagans. -- (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) The outrage! 50 lashes with a wet noodle. I don't care for his politics 100% but that man(? or whatever he is :-) ) has never been afraid to take chances artistically. Ziggy is on my 20 best albums of all time list. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Any tax, across the board, incents some behaviours and disincents others. Broadly, there seem to be at least three classes of taxation, although there may be others. These are: Income - a tax on the production of wealth Sales - a tax on the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) In the interests of not repeating myself: (URL) I don't think individuals have (in the general case) enough resources for personal liability to be feasable/sufficient. An example of this occured recently in Alberta - a number of people were (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) This is turning into a lynch-mob! (...) Well in that case I'll find a sturdy branch.. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
 
(...) It could be further argued that learning about HTML by viewing source is like learning to write well by reading good books. It is not the content that is of interest when you view source (usually the content is better present when viewed (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Does that responsibility follow them from job to job too? What about when they've retired? If the answer is 'no' to either of them, then I don't think that will work. Richard (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) There are two more, too: I found 3780, 3781, 3782, and 3783. Not to mention that he misquoted Bowie. Dave! (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
Since I guess this is partly my fault... (...) [snip] (...) Is it not a matter of scale? If I believed that you and they were both fascist-like but you were less so wouldn't I be as justified as you are by believing that they are at all? (Just to be (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) That's two trolls I've spotted from you, timestamped within 32 minutes of each other. You might want to review the charter of the group. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Redundancy (was Re: True Right Wing Fascists)
 
(...) Redundant is saying the same thing twice - typically in different words. An example is "that _big_ truck was _gigantic_." Chris (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
You know Scott, I really don't get you sometimes. My post was mildly derogatory to a faceless group - not to you - and you completely took it as an attack. (...) You're welcome to believe what you want. That's fine. I don't happen to believe the (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
(...) Yes. Redundant = unnecessary duplication. Using two things where one would be enough. However, I think that totalitarianism comes in both right-wing and left-wing flavors, so I don't see the redundancy in the term "right-wing fascist." Both (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
<388320C1.F3E0E6D1@eclipse.net> <FoHr3F.Isu@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) In some ways that might be true. In others, and I think these are more important, corporations would be (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Some auction pages just hurt your eyes.
 
(...) And eBay does have an interest in the listings being useable by people. If too many listings are unuseable, people will be less likely to use eBay, also, if the useablility of the listing eliminates a bidder or two, eBay may realize less (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
 
  Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
 
(...) <snip> Care to provide some reasoning behind this position, or is it just a troll? James (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Swearing?
 
This is just reminds me that the very obvious thing that why "religion" is nonsense: "Any given religion has always more disbelievers than its believers"..:-) Selçuk Mark Rendle <rendle2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FoJDxI.L0E@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
Mark Rendle <rendle2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FoJEuB.23x@lugnet.com... (...) I'm not a native English speaker, so sometimes I can't get some sentences true, but If I'm getting what you are saying correctly(1), you are just right about (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: True Right Wing Fascists
 
Isn't "Right Wing Fascist" redundant? -- Mark Rendle rendle99@hotmail.com "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:388476A5.EE261F...web.net... (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Swearing?
 
"All art is utterly useless" - Oscar Wilde -- Mark Rendle rendle99@hotmail.com "Jasper Janssen" <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote in message news:38764671.535053...net.com... (...) to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR