 | | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Its called a Loaded Question, a type of fallacious argument. A question with a false, disputed, or question-begging presupposition[1]. In your case the presupposition is that ROSCO's comments are snide. Ross in turn countered with the classic (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Actually, no he isn't. You are. You said "should we restrict someone's right to ACT like a jerk if they want to?" "Act" generally means action, not speech. (...) I'm not sure Nick is advocating the legal restriction of speech in any respect. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Basis of Nazism, was Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) There is an old saying that I enjoy: "The opposite of love is not hate, it is apathy." What love and hate have in common is that are a deeply passionate caring about someone else. "Caring" in the sense of concern/wonder about what happens to (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) You don't see a difference between a coordinated effort to complete destroy a race of people vs. a criminal justice system gone horribly wrong? Stalin had almost 30 years to kill roughly 20 million Russians - most of whom were killed in Gulags (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Basis of Nazism, was Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) How about this: I love cheesecake, but after I eat an entire one in a single sitting, my love is perverted into hate. Somehow I think that Mr. Hoffman was driving at a different point, though... Dave! (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Basis of Nazism, was Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Hmmm, now that is an interesting take. Care to expound? JOHN (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Basis of Nazism, was Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) This is an interesting point of view here Bruce. Although I am not religious and I don't see things in terms of good/evil and sin. Nazism being based on hate is not doing evil for evil's sake. Within your metaphor, the hate of Nazism is to (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Maybe I'm slow, but I'm not following here. What does this even mean? (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Hehehehe, nice! ~Kevoh (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Colorful language, albeit in acro form, should stay there, too. JOHN (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Thanks, man. Curse the lack of the edit button. A (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) WTF man... you forgot the footnote: (1) Pastiche skillz used on JLUG, should stay on JLUG. Legoswami (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) This post, however, is pure comedy gold. Spotlighted. ROSCO (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) I don’t think this is funny. The photohopping is amatuerish and non-humorous. The background isn’t very striking, nor is it funny either. The description is pretty plain, and not funny. The only thing at all amusing is the shock factor, but (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) I'd rate your skill at searching for phrases above lar's at searching for contests. ROSCO (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote: . (...) I don't know about any nysterious contest, figurative or otherwise, that is being referred to here, but perhaps this will help. (URL) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Thanks for that. I was including the term 'entry' in my search IIRC. (...) If that's what you meant, then that's what you should have said. Thanks for the feedback though. Perhaps you could provide some constructive criticism of it's (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) (URL) going to win any prizes) 813 hits. (URL) going to win the contest) 57 hits. Note that some (but not all) actually do refer to actual contests though... Something along those lines is what I had in mind. I'll happily admit I didn't type (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Is it? It's certainly not a common one. Googling the phrase yields nothing, but that might just be reflecting my lack of googling skills. Perhaps you could point some uses of that 'turn of phrase' prior to your using it in this thread? Perhaps (...) (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
|
|
(...) Ha! A likely story, especially considering this picture, recently declassified by NASA! (URL) What say you to this? ~Kevoh (19 years ago, 10-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
