|
|
 | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) (URL) I should caution that the place-of-birth listed in that second reference might strike some readers as borderline profanity...) Dave! (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Sorry, I just couldn't resist jumping in, being the nitpicker that I am, in the good spirits that I'm in right now. 1) That was not a pun, just a (IMO) joke so obvious that it was pretty pointless making it in the first place. 2) I think you (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Bye, bye Canada
|
| (...) Do you speak French? If not, I guess you don't speak to the vast majority of people here that speak French as their natural language, that have no idea that there is a Canadian culture (most people here wouldn't know that Avril Lavigne, Bryan (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) James, haven't you got the slightest idea of what you're talking about? I'm no more Canadian at heart that you are, I don't know, Martian. So even if all the official papers say that I'm whatever you want, I'm what I want, nothing more, (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Meh. Comments like that come from an education man I guess???... I was implying "about Lar". Stop talking about that person, not at all. I'm surprised a superior being like you couldn't understand that. (...) Woh... So by saying the "F" word, (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Here's the thing for me-- iwork for a Canadian company that has locations throughout Canada (except the Territories--I'd love that, but not so much at this time with the trips to the Yukon...) Anyway, we have 6 or so locatoins in the province (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I love LUGNET
|
| (...) I expect that you meant "an uneducated man," but it would be churlish of me to make an issue of a typo when I myself am endlessly guilty of same. However, it's a mistake to identify the dreaded "f" word as an indicator of a lack of education (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Lets see: Passport=Canadian Money=Canadian Last Referendum= Canadian Therefore, you are Canadian. You may be a Quebeccois, and I might be a Smurfing Squarehead (Insert apropriate swearword that started this whole thing instead of Smurfing if (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Then why didn't you? Would have been a good idea... (...) The "f" word is uncalled for, it is last resort of a man without ideas, foundations, positions, or principals. It is the tool of an uneducation man. I know Chris personally and he is a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Now you're teasing me... You know pretty well that I'm no Canadian... I'm Québécois and not part of your country, which is a fine country i might add, at all. --'Put up or shut (...) I'm not even talking about his Admin job... I'm talking (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Query: What in your opinion (not necessarily Dave but YOU the reader) is a satisfactory deterent/punishment for the planned killing of another human? (I'm not talking about drunk drivers or rage induced killings. I mean the serial killer or (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Excellent news!
|
| The Supreme Court (URL) has moved our nation> one step forward toward the abandonment of a barbaric practice! Way to go, Supremes! Not much to debate, I guess, except that the practice should be banned altogether. All in good time. Dave! (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
| (...) We can always use a good laugh. :-) (...) It's amusing that a religion founded on the principle that the King of England can divorce (or behead) his wife gets antsy about Prince Chucky's antics. (see "We can always use a good laugh" above) (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Especially since this issue may have hooks into the Novak/Valerie CIA agent outing issue a long time ago--outing a CIA spook is still treasonable, and, as yet, no resolution in sight. Yoe, if this happened under Bubba's tenure, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | At last, proof of the media's Liberal Bias
|
| //sarcasm on// Can someone point me to all of the articles on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC about the Jeff Gannon scandal? //sarcasm off// If a similar story had arisen during Clinton's administration, we'd have heard nothing else for the entire (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
| Snip (...) remarriage after divorce! Tim (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
| (...) Indeed there is - (URL) Posh Spice> has just had a baby! Scott A (who hates the growing vacuous celebrity culture) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should Prince Charles abdicate?
|
| (...) Speak for yourself mate! ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pics from ToyFair 2005
|
| (...) cost? The ideals of the past gave relevance to the notions that Military (guns) and Mortality (graves) were not the ethics the company was founded upon… What compromise is this? ...unfortunately, it’s a realistic one! But the new gun-heavy (...) (20 years ago, 20-Feb-05, to lugnet.year.2005, lugnet.general, lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Interview and interrogation, and who cares anyway? (Australia)
|
| Twelve months ago, our federal political leaders told us that no Australians were involved in the interrogation of Iraqi detainees. Now it turns out that Australians were involved in 'interviews', but not 'interrogations'. Interviews can be clearly (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
