| | Re: Another assault on the UN dashed on the beaches
|
|
I heard the R4 show Moniot refers to... it was quite scary: "The BBC's File On 4 programme has learnt that out of over $20bn raised in oil revenues during US-led rule, the use of $8.8bn is unaccounted for."...(URL) more>>>> Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barber Shop (Thread Hijack))
|
|
Does Canada not have some sort of register for self-confessed dirty old men? ;) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Another assault on the UN dashed on the beaches
|
|
The 'damning' probe into the UN Oil for Food Programme fades away from the popular press like a summer frost, but where is the spotlight on the financial management of relief and reconstruction programmes? (URL) if nothing else, the UN knows how to (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack))
|
|
(...) He found that exposed undergarments were 'offensive'??? K... well then... Maybe if a guy's undergarments were exposed... no need for that! But the thong/lowrider jeans combination? I've seen that and sometimes it's quite opposite of (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Looking for feedback.
|
|
(...) "Honest but nice?" What kind of liberal tree-hugging drivel is this? What I really want is to make him *think* I'm being nice while humiliating him in the eyes of his literate peers. Okay, maybe not. (...) Can I at least alert him to the, (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack))
|
|
I liked this story: (URL) Why underpants must stay under in the state of Virginia> Scott A (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Looking for feedback.
|
|
(...) Be honest, but nice--'I didn't enjoy the book.' If he attempts to lend you another, or try to involve you in a debate about why, just say, "It's not my cup of tea." and leave it at that. 'No thanks' always works for me when fellow employees (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Looking for feedback.
|
|
(...) By the way--the book to which I was referring in that longago post was *not* the bible. Anyway, I've found myself in a similar predicament with a different coworker and a different book. This time, my esteemed peer has heartily recommended a (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Activist Judges Legislating From The Bench
|
|
Since we all know how much Dubya hates them durned activist judges, I'm confident that he'll be speaking up to condemn (URL) scandalous over-reaching of judicial authority. For a moment, lets set aside the question of whether or not an (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: No Photo-Op Left Behind
|
|
(...) Scott, I don't know if you meant "surly" or "surely" there, but either way that's one of the most fitting word-blurs I've ever seen. (...) Clearly, you're one of those who hate freedom. Dave! (20 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|