Debate : 26609


Off-Topic / Debate / 26609	26608 \| 26610

Subject:	Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:08:20 GMT
Viewed:	815 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote: > I liked this story: > > <http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1409590,00.html Why underpants must > stay under in the state of Virginia> > > Scott A He found that exposed undergarments were 'offensive'??? K... well then... Maybe if a guy's undergarments were exposed... no need for that! But the thong/lowrider jeans combination? I've seen that and sometimes it's quite opposite of 'offensive', let me tell you... I'll gladly pay the fine for some of the women who may incur said fines by their clothing choices... ;) Dave K -fast becoming the 'dirty old man'...

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barber Shop (Thread Hijack))
Does Canada not have some sort of register for self-confessed dirty old men? ;) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 11-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Activist Lawmaker Legislating From The Barner Shop (Thread Hijack))
I liked this story: (URL) Why underpants must stay under in the state of Virginia> Scott A (20 years ago, 10-Feb-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search