 | | Re: Is Nader really a threat to Democracy?
|
|
(...) None of those got millions of votes last election. That level of votes truly *is* a vote for Bush. (...) Or to anyone that doesn't want Bush in power again, regardless of their party or non-party affiliation. (...) He should have been easy to (...) (21 years ago, 28-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Nader Really a Threat to Democracy?
|
|
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> wrote in message news:HtrMwH.7KL@lugnet.com... (...) community (...) of (...) represent (...) then I (...) Many of my fellow employees are shareholders. They benefit when the company benefits. The (...) (21 years ago, 28-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Nader really a threat to Democracy?
|
|
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" <talonts@vfaq.com> wrote in message news:403FA430.A8B67C...faq.com... (...) really (...) haven't (...) a (...) vote (...) Yeah, and... ...a vote for the Libertarian candidate is a vote for Bush... ...a vote for the Socialist (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Commanche helicopter
|
|
(...) Taken from dictionary.com: "Muskets, rifles, carbines, and fowling pieces are smaller guns, for hand use, and are called small arms. Larger guns are called cannon, ordnance, fieldpieces, carronades, howitzers, etc. See these terms in the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Nader Really a Threat to Democracy?
|
|
(...) I think I disagree with this argument. Corporations represent their shareholders, not their employees. Would you complain if some other place goes beyond tax incentives and actually pays the company to relocate elsewhere, without you? The (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Nader Really a Threat to Democracy?
|
|
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> wrote in message news:Htr6A9.1wy9@lugnet.com... (...) I think pork-barrel spending leads to corruption, but all hail the community so noble that they refuse to accept it. The lobbiests are at the root (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Commanche helicopter
|
|
"Mladen Pejic" <mladenpejic@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:Htnx0M.4Ex@lugnet.com... (...) by (...) (URL) This> is one of the articles I found using Google. (...) shaped-charge (...) thin (...) example (...) critical (...) Vietnam (...) could (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Have You Been Proselytized Lately???
|
|
(...) Hmm. This sounds just like what happened here in Scotland after Braveheart (another Mel Gibson film) was released. ;-) Scott A (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Commanche Helicopter
|
|
(...) “Besieged” by whom? Jordan? Egypt? Lebanon? Syria? Israel is a regional superpower whose current position is in no small part due to it's belligerence, nationalism and greed for land. I have no respect for the IDF; it does not take courage to (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is Nader really a threat to Democracy?
|
|
(...) Get real. You're deluding yourself. A vote for Nader at this point is *a vote for Bush*. Keep voting indirectly for Bush. But don't whine if GWB gets reelected and continues hauling the US into a decline that may take decades to reverse. I (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
