 | | Re: And so it continues....
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: ...[snip]... (...) That's a good question. Why does everyone seem to care so much about the current US administration? This gets repetitious and boring. How about dishing some dirt on your local (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | And so it continues....
|
|
(URL) it's so obviously the CIA that was mistaken. Not the Cheney report filtering process, or the White House outing a CIA operative because her husband was talking nasty about the Whitehouse and WoMD. Nope, again it's the intelligence agency. (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A lttile tiny cheer...
|
|
(...) Here's something, I've noticed that on this NG that most 'intellectual debaters' are not for the Patriot Act due to the limits on freedom and stomping on the Bill o' Rights... Yet another NG (remain nameless), the Patriot Act is seen as some (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Magnificent!
|
|
(...) Thanks, super Dave! DaveK, not to worry, it sounds strangely familiar... you'll think it's 2000 all over again. (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Magnificent!
|
|
(...) Rats! I have to wait until I get home to read this! Stupid corporate firewall!! Grr!! Dave K (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Magnificent!
|
|
(URL) 'nuff said.> (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The US is now in the hands of a group of extremists?
|
|
(URL) George Soros thinks so:> "I contend that the Bush administration has deliberately exploited September 11 to pursue policies that the American public would not have otherwise tolerated. The US can lose its dominance only as a result of its own (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A lttile tiny cheer...
|
|
(...) for expertly advising a terrorist organization to surrender, negotiate, or disband. I would _hope_ that wasn't the intent of the loose wording, but given the level of negative sentiment towards terrorism when the Patriot Act was passed, I (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A lttile tiny cheer...
|
|
for a little tiny victory. (URL) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For the conspiracy theorists out there?
|
|
(...) Next they'll blame iraq... (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: space policy backgrounder
|
|
Why the moon/mars idea was presented wrong and why it's actually a good idea (URL) Bush proposal has less to do with a vision of man's destiny than with a totally dysfunctional government agency. NASA gave us the glory of Apollo, then spent the next (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Marine Lawyer: Guantamano Military Tribunals fundamentally "unfair"
|
|
(URL) doesn't have "the slightest concern" about this. My view (repeated): while we cannot expect our citizens to be treated by our standards, or even fairly, when they are elsewhere, and they don't have the right to expect us to intercede on their (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For the conspiracy theorists out there?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HrwFCF.Dzo@lugnet.com... (...) (URL) (...) I agree.. the green men did it because US invaded Mars. ( and are planning their first McDonalds there). (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | For the conspiracy theorists out there?
|
|
(URL) it's the Iranians that are responsible for 9/11? My money's on little green men as being ultimately responsible but hey. (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heck, It's An Election Year
|
|
(...) I've not watched them all yet, but I loved the simplicity of "DESKTOP"! Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We're here to go
|
|
(...) I'm not sure you need to develop a new launch vehicle per se, remember the assumption that the person heading this had just won the X prize.... but certainly some of the 12B cost figure is for launching things... Now the X prize vehicle (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Heck, It's An Election Year
|
|
O-T.debate is a place I'll browse once in a while but this time I felt I had to pass this along. (URL) NOTE: If you disapprove of Bush, then you'll get a kick watching this stuff (I sure did!). Adr. (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We're here to go
|
|
(...) We don't yet have fusion reactors, much less ones that use He3, so He3 doesn't yet help us much. Yet. I'd rather stick to tech thats closer to proven (though I acknowledge bootstrappable manufacturing facilities aren't yet in commmon use I see (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We're here to go
|
|
(...) Speaking of which, (URL) here's> an interesting tidbit I've found. I don't know about the accuracy of the details, but it seemed sufficiently on-topic to bring it into the discussion. Dave! (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Yeah, thats what trademarks are for
|
|
(...) I thought it wasn't legally possible to trademark generic terms. This would be like McDonalds tradmarking the term 'hamburger'. Allister (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
