To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23155
23154  |  23156
Subject: 
Marine Lawyer: Guantamano Military Tribunals fundamentally "unfair"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:58:50 GMT
Viewed: 
271 times
  
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0122/dailyUpdate.html?s=entt

Rummy doesn't have "the slightest concern" about this.

My view (repeated): while we cannot expect our citizens to be treated by our
standards, or even fairly, when they are elsewhere, and they don't have the
right to expect us to intercede on their behalf, if we want to be a moral
country we *must* treat all *we* come in contact with fairly.

Guantanamo is fundamentally unfair.
The Patriot Act is fundamentally unfair.
Know your Customer is fundamentally unfair.
... going back ...
Internment of Japanese American citizens during WW II was fundamentally unfair.
... and back ...
suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was fundamentally unfair.
... and back ...
The Alien and Sedition Acts were fundamentally unfair.

Nobody's perfect.



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR