 | | Re: Now that I've had a chance to see the new colors
|
|
(...) If I remember correctly, you asked “What *POSSIBLE* reason would TLC lie?”. Well I gave you some possible reasons. You did not ask for probable, plausible or credible reasons. I answered your question fairly, and you attack me instead? Heck, I (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) That's right. I mean, how do you work with the ones that change their colors based on the whims of some focus group. (...) Yeah what I really want to talk about (the way to handle new colors in LDRAW) has gone underground with the LSC. I'm (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yaay...
|
|
(...) I wonder, though, what will prevent Dubya in his Imperial zeal, from simply throwing the matter to a non-public military tribunal? He certainly has no qualms about secrecy in these matters. (...) What the heck qualifies as belligerency? Does (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Yaay...
|
|
Let's see if it sticks, and if Rummy can follow directions, but this is a bit of good news: From: (URL) Bush (news - web sites) does not have power to detain American citizen Jose Padilla, the former gang member seized on U.S. soil, as an enemy (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Scott never does that. :-) Neither do any of the rest of us here. ;-) (...) Rule #1 if you see a big nesting, deeper than 3 or 4, and it's you and Scott(1), and you're not getting anywhere with your point, give up. (...) International Criminal (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Since it's illegal to threaten the life of the president of the US, I shall not tell you how I interpreted that line... That said, I do not believe that Dubya did anything that would warrant such a measure. If he did what he did out of the (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Heh, beat you to it. (URL) Your point is facile. Even if nobody did condemn the way US troops were (...) I'm not sure I made a point, other than that google is not the best way to search for old news. I did find it before you did though, or (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) That's not what I said (or at least not what I thought I said). I thought I said he gives the appearance (to me) of someone who believes what he's doing is right. As for myself, I find the lucrative buddy contracts questionable, and I can't (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Some might suggest putting Dubya in front of something else... Dave! (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) So Bush talks about Freedom and Liberty whist funding gross human rights abuses in places like Uzbekistan & Israel and you think he is not "dishonest"? He hands out "lucrative" contracts to his buddies and you think he is not corrupt? Wake up, (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
