 | | Re: Delicious!
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) I wouldn't eat that stuff under almost any conditions. They should feature it in 'Fear Factor' for the eating part.... I remember an old 'Wizard of ID' comic in which the King, while sitting (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Delicious!
|
|
(...) Doh! That's where I meant to put it. Force of habit, I suppose. Or maybe LUGNET suffered a glitch that put my .fun post in .debate despite my best efforts. That seems likely... (...) I feel worse and worse about posting the link, but I swear I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Delicious!
|
|
(...) Food can be scary--all the preprocessed stuff and additives and whatever. Yet people still live. And they're living longer now than 'ever before'. Eh, I eat what I want to eat, and try to take reasonable care of what goes into this (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Delicious!
|
|
(...) .debate. I presume you know that, Dave! It's also kind of annoying because it asks me if I want to install something or another (some spyware presumably, I turned it down pretty fast so I forget)... which I find ironic for a site ostensibly (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Hallowed by his name
|
|
Particularly objectionable to Reagan's sycophants was (URL) CBS's> choice not to include the scene in which the sacrosanct former President multiplied the loaves and fishes, nor the part in which he created the world in six days. No doubt The (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Why Shrub is a Radical, or Don't Listen to Me -- Pay Attention to What Bush Sr. Has Done...
|
|
For those that think the neo-con takeover is just business as usual, I give you this opinion piece: BUSH SR. SENDS NOT-SO-SUBTLE MESSAGE WITH AWARD TO KENNEDY (URL) When it was announced (with amazingly little fanfare) that the pugnaciously (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
|
(...) Yes, of course they do. And that's not always a bad thing except when it gets kinda rabidly slanted a particular way. I try to post stuff that is at least semi-objective from a huge variety of sources. Sure, some of it is just (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
|
(...) I would tend to think that this line of argument can be used against many of the sources (both factual and cultural) cited here on a regular basis... NPR, the NYT, Fox, The Economist, The Guardian, DemocraticUnderground etc, all have (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
|
(...) Although bias should not automatically be assumed, a media source that has demonstrated unrelenting bias (such as Ann Coulter or Michael Moore) then it is not unreasonable to suspect bias in any given piece. That's not to say that such bias (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
|
|
You mean the National Review is not a known right-wing rag run by William Buckley? Haven't I stated my own opposition to the Dems clearly or regularly enough? Why don't you do somehting useful like respond to this thread: (URL) The "Evil Dictator" (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
