|
|
 | | Re: God's Nature
|
| You're so far gone, there is no way to reply to that. No matter what I might state next you will insist that you can "interpret" the Bible in such a way as to reveal either an error in it, or in my interpretation of it. Everyone get that? The Bible (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | God's Nature
|
| (...) You are kidding, right? (...) Hmmm. So you are telling me that you know that exact nature of God? (...) That they perceived God was and whether God actually was are 2 very different things. (...) What are you implying here? That you understand (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
| (...) You confuse me. What is the difference? (...) Again you confuse me. Superior in what way? (...) Again with the confusion. Laws just don't pop up out of thin air. They are based on the morality and sensibility of a given society or culture. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Bush AWOL
|
| (...) When you combine this with (URL) you get part of MAD magazine's article: MAD's Deck of 52 least wanted Americans. One of which is the 2004 Democratic presidental nominee: Whether it be Al, Bob, Joe, or Rick, you want a loser take your pick. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Bush AWOL
|
| (7 URLs) What can I add to our national disgrace? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
| (...) Lenny, Christians would point to passages such as this from Mark 14: 61Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?" 62"I am," said Jesus. "And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Imperiled!
|
| (...) Thanks ROSCO. That brought a smile. Go git 'em, boys! Dave K -"I'm laughing at the superior intellect"--Adm JTK, ST:TWOK (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
| (...) Well, your clothing won't get you there as fast, but if you wear the bullet train, you'll probably be overdressed. Dave! (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
| (...) Apparently so, Dave! (...) Sure, Dave! ALL you have to do is let me get the last word, Dave! That's really not so hard, you know, Dave! (speaking of debates (internal in this case), I'm torn between taking the bullet train or taking more (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
|
| (...) I don't care enough to research the full breadth of Ms. Nagorka's work (which I likewise find disappointingly pedestrian), but the passage you cite strikes me as a critique by Debs & Co. rather than a formal declaration of intent by the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
