 | | Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
|
I'm uncomfortable with the idea of assassination as a worthy military or national goal, and I much would have preferred capture and trial. If killing them was the only way, then fine. But if there were options that were not pursued, then no. The (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
|
|
Although I don't revel in bloodshed, this should be great news to the entire world community. (URL) with evidence that these two were largely behind the guerrilla attacks on the coalition in Iraq hopeful the region will begin to calm down a bit. (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Who are the militia?
|
|
That was a fantastic read! I'll have to back there later and read some more stuff. I wonder though, if the government actually decided to do something like that, what reason would it have for NOT forcing the "new" militia into military service at a (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Oct. Report Said Defeated Hussein Would Be Threat
|
|
(...) NPR had a report on that very issue way back November or so, but the Liberal Media Conspiracy kept it out of the headlines since then... Pardon my cynicism, but here's how I think it'll happen, if it happens: If a chem/bio attack occurs, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Oct. Report Said Defeated Hussein Would Be Threat
|
|
Oct. Report Said Defeated Hussein Would Be Threat (URL) Last fall, the administration repeatedly warned in public of the danger that an unprovoked Iraqi President Saddam Hussein might give chemical or biological weapons to terrorists. "Iraq could (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Who are the militia?
|
|
I'm not usually one of the link suppliers, but I thought this was interesting. (URL) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
|
(...) Well, here's this week's "Top 10 Conserviative Idiots" which would be more humourous if people weren't dieing due to the ineptness, lying and outright warmongering of your current administration... (URL) K (21 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Tony Martin case: You can't {make up} better criticism of Liberals!
|
|
(URL) I literally laughed out loud in disbelief over this case. "A danger to Burglers"??? JOHN (21 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Further unravelling...
|
|
Of course, it goes against the context that Bush went on 'good intelligence' to justify the war when he *didn't* even consult the CIA... (URL) just what 'darn good intelligence' did Dubya go on? The Niger lies... THe 45 minute lies... The Unmanned (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Unjust, unwise, unAmerican
|
|
(...) However, even trial in regular court isn't quite what it used to be... (URL) "If we don't get our way and deny the defendant his right to a fair trial in the normal system, we're just going to take him to Gitmo so we get our way anyway. And (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
