 | | Re: Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
(...) Patriotism (war time illness) made you blind Larry? Or is this somebody else messaging here using Larry's name? Everybody knows which country supported most both Saddam (against Iran) and Bin Laden (against Russians). (...) Turkish voting of (...) (21 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
(...) Correct! I didn't want to boast about how many civilian lives we were saving by helping the US. It might have made the New Zealand readers feel bad. Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | DU is/is not a problem?
|
|
(...) This [HM Government funded] report's author was on Radio 4 the other night. His study was a desk study; parts of which have been superseded by a UN report: (URL) also conceded that the model he had used was unreliable, that he was not always (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | [no mention of bombed aspirin factories]
|
|
(...) Excuse me sir, can you tell me the way to the Chinese embassy? Surely you must have an A-to-Z? ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A look in the mirror & self-determination?
|
|
(...) You mean they have no right to self-determination? Even Scotland has its own parliament these days! (...) What about the USA? Who does it sell/give guns 'n' bombs to? (...) No mention of the USA's tactics? What was Pakistan to get for its (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
(...) Hey Richie, you failed to mention Oz! ;) Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) (Warning: turn your sarcasm detector off now - it may overload) Eureka! Now I understand! Turkey not helping the US probably costs thousands of innocent civilian lives? Of course! Now (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
(...) Well you could get a little comfort from thinking how accurate U.S. intelligence reports on WMD have been. ROSCO (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Iran: For peace in the region? No! For a piece *of* the region...
|
|
some excerpts from. (URL) senior leadership decided last month to send irregular paramilitary units across their border with Iraq to harass American soldiers once Saddam Hussein's regime fell, according to U.S. intelligence reports. "This confirmed (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Not necessarily biased, but not particularly brilliant, either
|
|
From: (URL) looming controversy: U.S. and allied use of depleted uranium in bunker-busting bombs and artillery rounds. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of the uranium that fuels nuclear reactors. It turns to fine dust when shells made from the hard, (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I *was* confused about the Canadian position, but I'm not any more
|
|
(...) Glad you liked it. Josette actually found this one and we were dying laughing. I don't think this is a completely correct statement of official position, mind you, but it's pretty funny. Nor is it reflective of any particular individual (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I *was* confused about the Canadian position, but I'm not any more
|
|
(...) " Let us be clear. We are in favour of UN resolutions but against their enforcement; against the use of force but in favour of the threat of it; against fighting the war, but in favour of winning it. This is part of Canada's unique national (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | I *was* confused about the Canadian position, but I'm not any more
|
|
Thanks, Mr. Coyne for clearing it up! (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Superhero Comic Book
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason Gross writes: I did get a chuckle out of your (...) ROFLOL! I don't believe in any god or messiah, but that sentence was so greatly put that I'll identify myself to Jesus for the first time in man ueays by saying (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Now, you have to read this ! How stupid can one get?
|
|
(...) Haha! J'ai voté dans le hall minifig de gloire juste à la rancune lui! Faucon Noir! J'en ai environ 100 un. Yes, I know, it's fractured, but what do you expect for an on-line auto-translator? -->Bruce<-- (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Now, you have to read this ! How stupid can one get?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Vive le Quebec! Vive le Canada!!! Dave K -who didn't get much past gr. 9 French class... :( Je ne parle pas francais :( (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Liberté, égalité, fraternité! [was Re: Now, you have to read this ! How stupid can one get?]
|
|
See: (URL) am seriously suggesting that we send back the Statue of Liberty given to us by our fickle ally in 1886. Obviouly, we no longer have use for a french created icon representing our country...and especially the freedom we've so dearly paid (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | thumb cuffs, oil & nukes Re: State department report on Saudi Arabia's Human Rights record"
|
|
(...) See also: (URL) Arabia is America’s top customer. Since 1990, the U.S. government, through the Pentagon’s arms export program, has arranged for the delivery of more than $39.6 billion in foreign military sales to Saudi Arabia [later] The (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: State department report on Saudi Arabia's Human Rights record
|
|
(...) Perhaps once Iraq's oil has been securred, the house of Saudi will be sidelined? ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Don’t you just hate the pinko US media?
|
|
(...) BBC Radio 4's "Today" pretty much sets the agenda here: (URL) ITN's C4 News is also proving its worth (URL)The real problem is how most americans just don't do ANY digging for the (...) Trust in the age of spin! (...) ...and if there are no (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
