To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *19271 (-10)
  Re: shut up and take a seat
 
(...) Agreed! Chirac was out of line with that statement. I know a few Canadian political snafus in the recent months have also landed folks in hot water. We can't tell *anyone* that they don't have a voice. That's the thing about 'freedom of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  shut up and take a seat
 
(...) You mean like what Jacques Chirac told the new Europeans the other day? (URL) is not well brought up behavior," Mr. Chirac said. "They missed a good opportunity to keep quiet." (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
 
(...) Oops, thought I hid that one better... Inconceivable! Dave K (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
 
HeyHEyHEY! (...) Quotes from The Princess Bride DO NOT belong in political debate. Don't you go ruining one of my favorite movies ;-) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: another goofy question from our resident Canadian! 8^)
 
(...) Oh my goodness!! I forgot all about that one! Thanks Dave! That's awesome! Dave K (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: another goofy question from our resident Canadian! 8^)
 
(...) (URL) Dave! (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
 
After doing some 'brief' research... I just get more and more set that people are idiots (part 3). I'd include myself in this category 'cause I have done and said some very stupid things... but in here, in o-t.d we throw around ideas, we discuss, we (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
 
(...) I'm afraid that I'm not a man of faith, so I can't accept your word without evidence, especially since your entire argument depends on it. If you intend to convince me (or anyone else who doesn't already agree with you), you'll need to find (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Was on CNN.com yesterday, basically saying the same thing in the article above (URL) this one has a quotation from the NBC spokesperson: " But NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks told The (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Liberalism: "Trojan-horse fascism without the jackboots"? [was What has to be the worst...]
 
(...) This story made it to the Guardian front page today: Thousands of Americans want to oust their president. The anti-war one, that is (URL) is under pressure to sack him from its hit show or face a boycott or withdrawal of advertising. Sheen (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR