 | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
|
(...) Have you read the proposed law? It was far to broad to enacted or objectively enforced. Any movie that portrayed high schoolers in adult situations, nothing graphic mind you, would be considered child pornography under this law. That is only a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Art..(again?) (was:Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?)
|
|
(...) "Perverse" is an emotionalism in this context so should probably be avoided in a serious debate on the subject. However, when I was younger (goodness gracious--when I was *half* my current age!!!!) I had several friends taking something like (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
|
(...) Yeah, I thought he was from England;-) (...) Yes, leave it to the scum to circumvent law to appease their perversions. The slippery slope slants both ways. Our society will be hurt by this. -John (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Art? (Was: Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?)
|
|
(...) I think I'll try at a definition I can live with: Art is that which is created/performed/presented with the intent of invoking an emotional reaction from those to whom it is presented. Child porn - Art? Only if it's the intent of the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
|
(...) Warning! Dave Koudys is espousing Libertarian rhetoric in the above :-) (...) Just as a note, the US Supreme Court ruled on this very topic this week and for once, by 5 to 4, got it right. (they ruled that depictions of acts by adults in a way (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
