 | | Re: Spyder is definitely bad for lugnet
|
|
(...) (URL) his 11 posted "newsgroup articles", and his (surge of 4 most recently), I would largely suggest that his input is for the most part negative. I wouldn't stoop personal name calling against him directly. This really doesn't do anything to (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Indeed, and why? Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself. Therefore, all progress (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) If you mean Larry P'k, he has already done that at least once. Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Scott will do. (...) Good. (...) To you. Perhaps, even to me. (...) Perhaps we can talk about that once you demonstrate how you give others a hard time when they post a message in a dead thread? Or perhaps you were stirring the pot? What am I (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Actually, he did. It didn't make front page news (I mean, evidently you didn't notice it). Which bolsters Scott's point, doesn't it? Maggie C. (who knows she should just shut up and stay out of this whole thing) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
I’m afraid I did not misspeak. Personally, I thought Tim’s post was self-indulgent{1}. I chose the term “melodramatics”, as I thought it was relatively innocuous. I suppose I’ll have to be even more careful in the future! Scott A {1} That's just my (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) Let me put it this way so you'll understand. For someone knowledgeable in general, (Dr.) Scott Arthur stated the "shared" view on the highlights of the newsposting to lugnet.general... if he found it so offensive, then why did he highlight it (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) For the record, just in case I was being a little obtuse, I concur with Scott, et al. that they are entitled to their opinion that mayhaps Tims Hiatus shouldn't have been listed in the Top Stories. Tho, when you look at it, if Suz took a (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) (not cutting out anything so as to not be accused of trying to manipulate the argument) (Dr. Scott) Arhur, I don't think anybody here is trying to prevent you from stating your view. My point was that your view was already expressed at least (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) There have been issues in LUGNET, and there have been long, drawn out threads to help resolve these issues, and there has even been some 'flame wars' 'n such, but what I continue to notice, time and time again, is that much comes from the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
<snip> (...) Jude, this seems to me like an attempt to get something started. So don't do that, it's the last thing we need. While I agree with the message that Tim's original post carried, (in fact, I agree *very* strongly with him, but that's for (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On Hiatus
|
|
(...) I guess that means the conversation is over, the admin thinks it's noise. Jude FUT o-t.debate (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting look at the SSSCA
|
|
So like...some politicians were bought out by Big Money... ...SHOCKING!! Seriously, that was an interesting read. Thanks for the link. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Interesting look at the SSSCA
|
|
(URL) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A hypothetical economics question... (long)
|
|
(...) Then lenders will be reluctant to loan. But that doesn't mean that they won't do it ever again under any circumstances. They'll just make the loan's terms more favorable to account for the risk. (...) I understand that this is what the FDIC (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A hypothetical economics question... (long)
|
|
(...) loans. If the individual defaulting has trouble with credit, what happens when the entire system (everybody) defaults. Think of the people that were reluctant to put money in the bank after the Great Depression and all the bank defaults. The (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A hypothetical economics question... (long)
|
|
(...) Unless he shared ownership with 99 other folks each of whom could come up with $1K. Joint ownership instead of borrowing, right? (...) Actually, that's just getting a loan. Finding partners who want their share value to increase seems more (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
|
(...) I had to check this one in my copy of the OED (Oxford Emoticon Dictionary) You're right, that's not right. It's supposed to be = ;^) It drives me crazy when folks don't emote properly with previously unused characters on the keyboard. I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
|
Well, as long as we are being anal, we might as well point out that the use of ";-)" is of no value to proper written English. In other words, it is not grammatically correct. The rest of us probably knew what the implied meaning of "beg the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The "Unknown" Santa Fe
|
|
(...) Sure there's such a thing. You mean you've never competed in it? If you're interested in tickets let me know, I'll give you my Paypal ID so that you can send money. I also accept Canadian Tire money at par. Of course, if you're not of legal (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
