|
|
 | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) Can we go with hoi polloi? (...) That *is* fascinating--on what is that belief based? And where the heck have you been? I haven't seen you on OT.Debate in like a year?! Dave! (24 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Maybe I am sticking my nose where it does not belong, but I find it unlikely that countries with insurmountable debt are the only countries that would be inclined to invade other countries. As I understand it, prior to WW2, most nations were (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) Like any self-respecting and haughty high-born conspirator, I much prefer the term "great unwashed" to "the sheep." So let's go with that please. (...) Actually, I think existence of such is mandatory, but you say unlikely, how fascinating. (24 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Ummm, how do you know that? Have you asked everyone? Regardless, I also live in a middle class area with low crime, and would postulate the ownership of guns is also fairly low (seeing it's pretty hard to convince our PM of the need to own (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: A small rant on an unrelated issue
|
| (...) LOL :-) -Mike Petrucelli (24 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
