To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15634
15633  |  15635
Subject: 
Re: An armed society...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:48:56 GMT
Viewed: 
1558 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:

So no nation would gain by taking the goods of another?  I don't see that WWII
happened because Germany was trying to break into Polish, French, or
Austrian market economies.  They wanted to take their stuff (foremost of
which (I guess) was productive capacity).  It was simple thuggery.  How has • the
EC changed that?

Prior to WWII Germany was in debt to france for reparations from WWI.  It was
also in the midst of a huge economic crisis.  It was literally cheaper to burn
money than it was to buy coal.

-Mike Petrucelli

Maybe I am sticking my nose where it does not belong, but I find it unlikely
that countries with insurmountable debt are the only countries that would be
inclined to invade other countries.  As I understand it, prior to WW2, most
nations were in some degree of economic depression ("huge economic crisis"
would fit many of them), however most were able to restrict themselves from
invading their neighbors.  But I think the lack of self-assuredness that
they could pull off an invasion was more of a deterrent than "not needing
the money" for those that managed not to loot their neighbors.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) I'm quite glad you dropped in. A debate isn't a debate unless different viewpoints are expressed, right? :-) (...) Agreed, for the generality of cases. (...) Perhaps you are neglecting the importance of the markets open for each country: (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) the (...) Prior to WWII Germany was in debt to france for reparations from WWI. It was also in the midst of a huge economic crisis. It was literally cheaper to burn money than it was to buy coal. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR