Subject:
|
Re: An armed society...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 04:32:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1559 times
|
| |
|
|
> So no nation would gain by taking the goods of another? I don't see that WWII
> happened because Germany was trying to break into Polish, French, or
> Austrian market economies. They wanted to take their stuff (foremost of
> which (I guess) was productive capacity). It was simple thuggery. How has • the
> EC changed that?
Prior to WWII Germany was in debt to france for reparations from WWI. It was
also in the midst of a huge economic crisis. It was literally cheaper to burn
money than it was to buy coal.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Maybe I am sticking my nose where it does not belong, but I find it unlikely that countries with insurmountable debt are the only countries that would be inclined to invade other countries. As I understand it, prior to WW2, most nations were (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) chance (...) the (...) Well, for a start, anyone who happens to be shooting at me. Even if they're doing it in support of a nation-idea against which I am fighting. (...) So no nation would gain by taking the goods of another? I don't see that (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
