Subject:
|
Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:56:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1620 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> Like any self-respecting and haughty high-born conspirator, I much prefer
> the term "great unwashed" to "the sheep." So let's go with that please.
Can we go with hoi polloi?
> Actually, I think existence of such [a broad, insidious conspiracy] is
> mandatory, but you say unlikely, how fascinating.
That *is* fascinating--on what is that belief based?
And where the heck have you been? I haven't seen you on OT.Debate in like
a year?!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) Like any self-respecting and haughty high-born conspirator, I much prefer the term "great unwashed" to "the sheep." So let's go with that please. (...) Actually, I think existence of such is mandatory, but you say unlikely, how fascinating. (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
