 | | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) In all fairness Communism is INdefensible from first principles, if you accept the rights based principle that people have the right to maximum freedom, or the utilitarian principle that we should strive for the system that produces the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) In all fairness Communism is defendable from first principles yet is always said to be bad. I agree with the ideal of communism but not Marxism. In an ideal communism state there is no tax, no unemployment. I've missed out on most of this (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: stunningly geedy people
|
|
(...) It was for gag-purposes only? (...) Carbon "I was quoting a sketch from the Fast Show, BBC2" 60 ICQ # 5643170 (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An interesting URL from my favorite newspaper
|
|
(...) I wonder how many people can read those words and not be moved by them? Small measures, indeed. ''If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace,'' (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <377E75DD.377FC107@v...er.net>... (...) One thing that does worry me a bit is if our capability to identify genetic markers for those diseases which are genetic outstrips our ability to improve care for them knowing (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
