To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *12116 (-10)
  Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
 
(...) I agree with your point on parties. I decided a few years ago that I would never join a party again as it was too much of a compromise. Likewise I try not to pigeonhole myself as being assigned to any particular political ideology. That way, I (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Go ahead, make my day!
 
(...) Richard's statement that I was responding to refered to "No one here...", i.e. he was refering to the respondents in the collective. I replied in the collective, which Richard seems to have missed. I'm not going to reply to Richard's message (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factory Pictures Finally
 
(...) I still do not see why he has to change it to siut you. its a factory to him. Josh (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Steve Lane
 
(...) I always remember who comes from the UK, CAUSE I DO TOO! I'll probably bump into him at a Legofest some day. (...) I think flat fee's are a lot more popular in the UK now than they we're. I pay a flat flee. I'm glad Scott is keeping the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Factory Pictures Finally - Explanation of Curved roof
 
(...) Jesse I will take your 'demand'? of yellow and black striped tiles as a suggestion, and consider it when I get around the finishing the details. Thank you for the suggestion. But as far as smokestacks go, I have been to a number of (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.town)
 
  Re: Steve Lane
 
(...) Wow, that burst my bubble! Here I thought he was this extraordinarily clever guy capable of sifting through incredibly long and complex threads and coming up with retorts, rejoinders, and references at lightning speed! (That would also explain (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Go ahead, make my day!
 
(...) It doesn't require apriori knowledge, just willingness to examine the law, and decide if it's a just law or not. (...) Defacto you are correct, in most cases this is what happens. Dejure you are wrong, common law (and case law if you can find (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Go ahead, make my day!
 
(...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Go ahead, make my day!
 
(...) <snip> Richard I totally agree with you here but would just like to point out that Bruce MIGHT be responding to Tom S. who I think is shading a bit more towards planting evidence than you. But you're doing great so don't let me stop you! :-) (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Steve Lane
 
Remember, Scott is in the UK, so he probably pays by the minute, unless Amuricans, who mostly have flatfee. In that case, posting them all, then going on later to authorize via email all at once saves money for Lego. Me, I post all at once from time (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR