|
|
 | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) As I said in another post, though, whether they choose to GET pregnant isn't quite relevant. Whether they choose to STAY pregnant is their choice. (...) Lasik isn't relevant, really. I had it done, and was watching TV that night (I drove (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) PAID time off? If you don't also give Paternity leave, yes, it is. And that still makes it unfair to those that choose not to have kids. (...) Yes, it would be a choice, assuming that miracle pill had zero side effects for anyone. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Generally, I would say that this is the case, but not always. I'll leave that to another thread. (...) I don't necessarily agree with this, but I see your point. How about LASIK or other elective surgeries? As far as I know most people (at (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) I dunno-- it may still be relevant... see below... (...) So, if they DON'T choose it, is it sexist/unfair to give women paid time off? Likewise, couldn't a woman choose to take the pill to at least lessen the effects of PMS? Or, embarking into (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Yes, yes, and no. This should really be in a separate thread, but... Women usually CHOOSE to get pregnant. I don't think they should get PAID time off for a medical condition they CHOSE to have. I also don't think parents should get paid Flex (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
