|
|
 | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Absolutely correct. As you're fond of saying, this is a big tent, with room for all. However, and I think this is Dan's point, between hard-core builders and hard-core collectors, there is a significant paradigm shift. To me (and I suspect Dan (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Alright, a little overzealous, but I can live with that. We be cool then. Bruce (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| That's good, I can go with that... Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Why *side* with either? Why are there sides *at all* for that matter? That is what is baffling me. This isn't a territorial war, is it? Both "sides" can "win", can't they? I'm a builder AND a collector and there is nothing wrong with being (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| Hey that's cool Bruce, I got a little out of hand, I re-read the thread and I hear where your comming from, I ussually don't get like that on Lugnet, sorry. You rasied some good points, I hope people can appreciate this as I did. I'm 30, so I feel (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
