|
|
 | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| Hey that's cool Bruce, I got a little out of hand, I re-read the thread and I hear where your comming from, I ussually don't get like that on Lugnet, sorry. You rasied some good points, I hope people can appreciate this as I did. I'm 30, so I feel (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| ----See below (...) ----I guess it bothered me that he said Lego isn't a good collectible, if his opinion is different I guess I should'nt slam him, infact I do respect his opinion. (...) ----Ahhh nothing, I know it's wrong to do that.....sorry (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Great point! From a LEGO builder's point of view, I look at unopened or unused LEGO as a waste of fun, creative and exciting possibilities! I think Eric slightly overdid it in his last post by calling Bruce out, as if creativity makes a (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| (...) Well... I dunno if "attacked" is the right word here-- surely if you offer up an opinion that others don't share, they're likely to respond. It's human nature, not Lugnet. Of course attacking does happen, but usually, people set a tone. If I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) I hold Lego in extremely high regard - you are confusing an honest analysis of Lego on the "collectable toy market" with a derogatory attack. That Lego makes a poor "collectable" is a *good* thing, in my opinion. You need to go back and (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
