To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *10806 (-10)
  Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
 
----See below (...) ----I guess it bothered me that he said Lego isn't a good collectible, if his opinion is different I guess I should'nt slam him, infact I do respect his opinion. (...) ----Ahhh nothing, I know it's wrong to do that.....sorry (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) Great point! From a LEGO builder's point of view, I look at unopened or unused LEGO as a waste of fun, creative and exciting possibilities! I think Eric slightly overdid it in his last post by calling Bruce out, as if creativity makes a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lugnet has a problem
 
(...) Well... I dunno if "attacked" is the right word here-- surely if you offer up an opinion that others don't share, they're likely to respond. It's human nature, not Lugnet. Of course attacking does happen, but usually, people set a tone. If I (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) I hold Lego in extremely high regard - you are confusing an honest analysis of Lego on the "collectable toy market" with a derogatory attack. That Lego makes a poor "collectable" is a *good* thing, in my opinion. You need to go back and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
 
(...) Why do you say this? Because Bruce doesn't have the same opinion as you? (...) What do your creations have to do with the debate at hand? (...) Um, what? (...) What does this have to do with anything? How does one person's creations and the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: REPOST of canceled message 03
 
(...) I don't think you know how to pretend. That seems to be one of several social skills you weren't able to learn. My theory would be that you were neglected and didn't get the attention that you wanted as a child. Now, you are (age wise, not (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: The legend died (Re: The legend lives)
 
(...) Where did you get these *facts* from? If what you say is true, the running of LEGO is far worse than I thought. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGO Legends
 
(...) window? (...) you (...) Gaurav, This comment was actually directed at Steve. I think it's fine to just post the set numbers. I only know about a dozen technic sets by number, but I don't mind typing a number I don't know into the Lugnet (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGO Legends
 
(...) Okay I will start doing this in my posts from now on. I actually memorized all the Technic set numbers some time ago (result of staring at Technic catalogs for years; hehe I'm a nut :-) ) and keep thinking that everyone else has done the same, (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR