 | | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
(...) I don't know the conspiracy side of it at all, but it make head head feel like an over ripe walnut waiting to explode. I just can't drink diet bevs, etc. Mostly I drink water and whole juices, so it's not really problem, but I do occasionally (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
Sorry for the delay in replying. (...) Here's an interesting stat from (URL) thirty-five countries surveyed in 1991, the United States cardiovascular death rate ranked 17th for both males and females. The highest death rates were in the Soviet (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) If they can't diagree, then how can they have their own opinion? You may have you own opinion, but hey do to even if it dosn't agree with yours. (...) Oh, and Any Old set being re-released is good, I'm not particliarly into castle, but I've (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Virtues of Veganism?
|
|
(...) I've seen the cycle Dan describes many times. (...) I think what Chris means is that a lot of stuff that we put out at the curb to recycle is actually landfilled if there is no market for it. 'Recycled' newspapers are commonly discarded in (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) hold on now, just a dang minute! don't go getting all touchy feely and trying to hug me and all that or I might just have to bust a cap up in here! (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) First this statment is totally wrong. You can have your own opinion even when everyone disagree. Now do you notice this is a FAN group? We are not a group of professional news reporter or something like that. It's like going to a Star Trek (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Dang, that's pretty messed up, man! Well, I love ya! ;^) And it's good to see you back. Dan (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
|
(...) Uh...hi folks. I took a break from lugnet for a bit around april. I still uh..."lurked"...I think thats what you internet folks call it. Any way, I took a break cause I was taking some things a bit seriously. I'm full of hypocrycies, I think (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
|
To hopefully forestall the next person whining about noone paying attention to them. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) Hah! Really? That's too bad, it *is* a nifty allegory. I hate it when one of those great sentences has no reality-base. Boo. (...) Hah! I know someone who *did* turn it on. Ewww. And amazingly, he's my best friend. ;-) I shudder at the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
