|
> From: "Lorbaat" <eric@nospam.thirteen.net>
<snip>
> Someone mentioned cutting the ball off
> Throwbot/Slizer ball-and-socket joints... that's just wrong, IMHO.
That was me. Didja forget? ;^)
> That takes
> all the fun out of working inside limitations, and renders the point of making
> it in LEGO moot to me.
No, what it does in this particular instance is, it makes a single use SPUD,
the thrower arm, useful in a multitude of ways because it can now interface
with anything that accepts a technic axle.
My examples cannot be "worked inside" because they are SPUDs in the truest
sense of the word. A Throwbot arm is still a Throwbot arm, no matter where
you put it, because it can't interface in any other way. If they'd put a
couple Technic holes in it, then I would probably not have cut mine, I'd
have built on top of them.
> At that point, why not just build a model, or machine
> down metal peices?
OK, carrying the example a bit too far, there. There are a lot of steps
between "modifying SPUDs in rare and specific circumstances" and "machine
down metal pieces."
~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|