 | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Most of what was posted I do agree with- this group has clone brands as its topic and if one doesn't like clones, (BTW, I don't) then one shouldn't post b####'n here. BUT, that doesn't mean one cannot read what is posted. Here is my reason for (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Am I shocked that you can’t put it politely? Nope, not at all - and you know what? Thats sad, but thats what you have proven time and time again. (...) Wrong. I am entitled to my opinion even if I had never even seen a MegaWhatever in person, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MB quality
|
|
(...) I would say so, I never got one cause it wans't to scale with the others. (which are close enough) (...) I have had the samething happen with lego before. Specifically the ship I built almost 4 years ago. (URL) here> I had the front fork (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MB quality
|
|
(...) I would say so, I never got one cause it wans't to scale with the others. (which are close enough) (...) I have had the samething happen with lego before. Specifically the ship I built almost 4 years ago. (URL) here> I had the front fork (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MB quality
|
|
(...) I'm afraid that that's an unfortunate and (IME) non-representative example. I've built simultaneously larger and flimsier structures that have stood up quite well under their own weight, so something else seems to be at play in your case. (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | MB quality
|
|
(...) Does the nuclear sub with sound element count as being within "the last two to three years"? That set, partially completed (the hull was about 4-5 rows of bricks high) crumbled under its own weight when extended 1 foot off the edge of a table (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) I agree, my dear Lord Insanity. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) The last 2-3 years being the operative phrase there. Prior to that, well... (URL) read here.> That said I agree that within the last 2-3 years Mega Bloks has improved significatly. On a scale of one to ten I would say Lego is a 9 and Mega (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Gee, how can I put this politely...I guess I can't! But... You, Mark, are in a newsgroup called "off-topic.clone-brands." Whereas your considered opinions are encouraged, your flat out clone-bashing is not. Now, I'm not the boss of you -- but (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) lol, whatever. It is its fitting the bricks are dirty - no matter how they got dirty, or what got them dirty *its fitting they are dirty*. Stop trolling!! Geesh, do you never get tired of this? People like you really make enjoying Lugnet hard (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
