 | | IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
A small box arrived in the mail at work today from IBM. Inside was a small package of Mega-Bloks, and just about no explanation as to why they were included, apart from the statement "IBM has what you need to build a Resilient Infrastructure". I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: A serious clone question
|
|
(...) I've only been buying MegaBloks since 1993, but most of them are holding up quite nicely, thanks. Admittedly, the translucent elements from that period are not too great and are subject to loss of clutch, but I have thousands of green or brown (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: A serious clone question
|
|
(...) How so? You modified a piece of Lego. You didn't create it. You modified a product already covered by patent. (23 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A serious clone question
|
|
(...) Good to see you keep an open mind:0) I can tell the difference between Lego and Clones -any clone- simply from the sound. They sound cheap and they are cheap. In respone to your paint analogy- An artist uses quality products not cheap knock (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A serious clone question
|
|
(...) I like how you minimize the problems of others. And perhaps I am exaggerating these problems -- but let's not pretend there isn't a problem at all. There really is a problem here and if there wasn't people wouldn't be so defensive about it. If (...) (23 years ago, 19-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
