|
| | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) ....grumble.... The most damning part is that you may be indirectly correct. I haven't kept step with all of the whys and wherefores of the LDraw file-header conventions, so there may be a glitch resulting from my failure to match my custom (...) (14 years ago, 4-Dec-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: LPub Error Message?
|
| (...) "PURE" is a dead givaway.... I think you left the next line of the error message out: R6026 -impure parts detected in library, aborting. Try removing all Mega***** from your libraries (and your house, while you're at it, for good measure) and (...) (14 years ago, 4-Dec-10, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | very quiet here
|
| Cheers (14 years ago, 25-Nov-10, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
| | | | Setup test
|
| This is a test. (14 years ago, 21-Oct-10, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | Now what...?
|
| Please work... (14 years ago, 6-Oct-10, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | testing
|
| this is a test (14 years ago, 20-Sep-10, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | test
|
| Test message. (14 years ago, 19-Sep-10, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | Re: Calling Out Dave!
|
| (...) YES! Diabolically brilliant, nest paw? JOHN (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: Calling Out Dave!
|
| (...) Which Dave are you dissing? (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Calling Out Dave!
|
| Not only did he not read War And Peace, but he only skimmed the Cliff Notes for it! That is what I heard, anyway. JOHN (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) A little late on the reply here (missed this post), but here goes anyway: I don't see them as bad per se, it's just that they seem to be replacing LUGNET, because people only have so much time to devote to LEGO (what is wrong with these (...) (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) Editing goes against "the newsgroup spirit", which was a big deal to Todd... (and maybe that means the implementation of editing would be hard, I have no idea) But cancellation, if by the author, does not go against that spirit, in my view. (...) (14 years ago, 31-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) I also agree that Lugnet was THE place to go back in the day and I also wouldn't mind seeing it rise again. But I am just thinking that Lugnet's inability to edit and cancel posts will be a huge factor preventing it from being the proverbial (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) While I am also disappointed with the reduced interraction on LUGNET, I don't see other boards as bad, even if they aren't superior in features. And I totally disagree about flickr - it allows conversations to go every which way no matter (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) Yeah, but I think that the analogy is flawed. The horseless carriage is FAR superior to what it replaced; other boards may have a nice feature here and there, but they are not VASTLY superior to LUGNET. I think that there is great value in (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
| (...) You know, Horse and Buggy Repairmen were the same way about the horseless carriage ;) (...) I suppose it's nice to dream,,, :P (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
| (...) LOL Stonehenge!! Good one, Manfred! I have heard of (URL) Duncan's handiwork> before! :-) JOHN (14 years ago, 26-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
| (...) Mmm-mmm, Stonehenge was a VERY advanced calculator, for it's time... (14 years ago, 22-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
| (...) I'm not worried about disk space so much as I am worried about render/move/edit time. Unnecessary polygons, even after being read in and converted into internal models, take time to process. I think you can see the difference in POVray render (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
| | | | Re: Taking shortcuts
|
| (...) But that was a long time ago :-) Nowadays we *do* have an awful lot of disk space, and don't really have to squeeze the files. OTOH, every 'unnecessary' byte to read will take time, again and again while rendering, unless the rendering program (...) (14 years ago, 21-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |