  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: I sincerely doubt that either post will cause a (...) Sounds like a great them for a time travel movie! (...) Well, I still respect you. And I think we actually feel the same way about the original (...)   (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) Yes. But my point here is that by responding with a reference to the cartoon you're making it a little bit more likely to be seen by the very people that you think may get upset. I sincerely doubt that either post will cause a calamity but it (...)   (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) Although it's unlikely that LEGO intended the set as a commentary on Abu Ghraib, their choice to foreground an institutionalized torture chamber speaks of a curious lack of sensitivity on the subject. Given TLG's long-standing policy of (...)   (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) Which is exactly my original point. Any focus group could stumble upon Richie's original post and get all up in arms over it and start some sort of movement against LEGO. Putting the idea out there, anyone can read it and over-react any number (...)   (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) But that is why we have .off-topic.debate ;) (which both of us forgot to move to... sorry, Lugnet) (...) I suspect the cartoonist either didn't think much at all or consciously set out to be malicious but we'll never really know the answer to (...)   (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.licensed.batman, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | test
  |  
  | 
i can't post from mozilla thunderbird, let's try from the web    (18 years ago, 6-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) I remember a time when there were no weapons in the sets. There were pieces that you could pretend were lasers in the space sets. It was a gentler time then I quess. But I do remember that lego made a plastic toy gun at one time, perhaps (...)   (18 years ago, 5-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) I guess I was using your opinion and those that spotlighted it as a barometer for what the public is thinking. Its usually safe to assume that if someone has a mild discomfort towards something, someone somewhere is up in arms about it.    (18 years ago, 5-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) It certainly does, though it's not something I choose to portray in my pirate MOCs and not something that LEGO has chosen to portray in its sets (beyond prison cells, and planks for walking. Oh, and I once built a guillotine). (...) Conflict (...)   (18 years ago, 4-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) That's clearly true, and it's unfortunate that there's always somebody eager to be offended by pretty much everything--not that Richie is such a person, but his thoughtful question definitely brings the issue to mind. (...) Also clearly true, (...)   (18 years ago, 4-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
  |  
  | 
(...) I understand where you're coming from. But I wonder, where do we draw the line between having fun and addressing every possible concern that could arise? The pirates theme, your theme of choice I believe, has a disgusting and horrible true (...)   (18 years ago, 4-Jun-07, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  !  
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Cafe' Corner (10182)--is anyone building this?
  |  
  | 
(...) But that's okay, I suppose, because it ends up that millions of American boys are buying millions of $$$ worth of Bionicle to build those 3 things. So what ends up good for TLG is good for me (taking the cynical, pragmatic road here:-) Plus, (...)   (18 years ago, 1-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) Three-fer-one: "We've" "Weave" "We.tv" I'm so punny, I've got myself in stitches! JOHN    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) Wouldn't that have been "weave"? -Rob    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) (URL) We've> suspected as much.    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) I'm sew plaid you awl seam it that way. -Rob    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) "and all that"? I'm missing the jelly-nexus (But I like that term for a band name!) (...) You are a wise man, Dave! (...) You're right! For starters, I would have complained about your redundancy... (...) I'm filing that info in my Rolodex (...)   (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) Hey, it doesn't modder to me one whey or the udder, Rob! JOHN    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
Snip... (...) I'm just dyeing to bobbin here to string you guys along unless, of course, you'd prefer me knot in which case I'll bale. -Rob    (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
  |  
  | 
(...) Well, mint jelly and all that... (...) We've decided that we're just going to skip those. (...) No, but if I'd used the official designation of Mega-Scale Mega Bloks, I'm not sure that you'd have known what I meant. Duplo is "Mega-Scale" LEGO, (...)   (18 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)   
   |