 | | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
--snip-- (...) Hi John, Thanks for taking that on board. Noone is saying your contribution isn't worthwhile and I don't think anyone minds your regular updates of what you've done. If you stick to these I think we will all be happier. It also means (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) I differ with you here. Serious collectors need to know. You have no idea how many are wrong. This is not impolite. It is a systemic problem. Would you feel that it is more polite just to note it on Lugnet? If that is a solution I can do it. I (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Yep--I'm the Mad Dave around here! Worked long and hard for that title and I'm not willing to give it up to any old Dave! Dave K (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Actually, although it was impolite to call me "Mad Dave", I was very amused at the title. Perhaps you've confused the myriad of Dave's involved, or perhaps you have this vision of me where I'm shouting at the top of my lungs or something. (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Yes you do. - "If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you." - "Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down." - "remember 7 comes after 6 and before 8, perhaps that will help." (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) --snip-- (...) John, It was not polite to make the comment "Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit since they did a few.". The reason it isn't polite is because it is a) unneccesary and b) expectant as (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Tim: I was not rude to volunteers, I even offered to volunteer to get thing done. I want to help and have only come here when Dan ignored my requests as to what was happening to the corrections sent into Peeron.com. I am still not sure what (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: --snip-- (...) John, You're really beginning to make me very irritated. You seem unable to accept responsibility for the way you put things and seem to justify this in a variety of ways including (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) For a guy who's thick-skinned, you sure when to a lot of trouble to prove it. (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Thanks Dave: Thanks Dave: I treat others well. If anything is rude it is the people that take apart every comment I make, which I really do not give a hoot about. The inventories are messed up; I am trying to fix that. Almost every one I look (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Then please, leave out the commentary. You come across as being condescending, insulting, and rude. If you have corrections that you want to post to Lugnet, well, fine I guess. But if your intent is to start a flame war so that it draws (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Oh no, not that old Mac vs PC again!
|
|
(...) I have never said or even thought of Apple appearing to be dead. But my experience of Mac users is that they have had a very condescending attitude towards us Windows losers... I mean users. As you and I haven't discused this utterly boring (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Notetab
|
|
(...) LOL Notepad creates at least one registry entry too (and I don't want to know how many more!) ROSCO (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Thanks. I've already done that now. /Tore (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Apple *no longer appears to be a dead company* and now we are the snobs? (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Notetab
|
|
(...) Ok, I replaced Notepad with Notetab, and it is surprisingly fast and in all ways better than MS Notepad. All ways - except one: I also replaced one single .exe file with 129 files in 7 new folders, 3.37 Mb using 5,4 million bytes of disk (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) I've been dealing with this issue my whole Mac using life. I can understand your frustration but not your insistence that everyone comply with your OS. When I've done that in the past I get laughed at. The very existence of the LDraw for Mac (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) And Notepad.exe is 56 kb. Yes, I know I exaggerated. I think I had NoteTab or something very similar in my previous Windows installation due to the 64k limitation in Notepad. And before that, I hacked Notepad to suggest the .dat extension in (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) And, of cousre, the long filenames. :) I rushed together a DOS program called linefix.exe that takes care of the linefeeds while you uploaded the new version of the MPD. I never use MLCad even though it is installed. Browsing parts or models (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Last I checked, the Notetab light installation was 1.4M (yes it still fits on a floppy), and it loads in less than a second on my XP machine. I have been using it for at least 3 years, and I would also highly recommend it for Windows users. (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
