 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) "Regularly chiming in every few months" over a period of 6 months means chiming in twice, spaced "regularly" over the time, i.e at 3 months and 6 months. Chiming in twice in the last 6 months could mean chiming in on Day One and Day Two, and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Well, he could have used Tom, Dick, or Harry, but then I would have had to pipe up ;-) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) "Good evening!" JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Hmmmm *tempted* Then remembers just how much trouble I am already in, and silently walks away. Janey "More innocent than she appears, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) And in doing so missed the savory "Lady of the lake" bit. Really, I can't keep lofting these puffballs into your court and not have you put them away! (...) No, Minifig, my little yellow friend, now is not the time for "nevermind".... A (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Rats!! I jumped right past that! I should be spanked.... Nevermind. Dave K (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, the line for which I was trolling was: "You don't vote for kings". (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Believe it or don't, my next door neighbor's name is Bob Doe. JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) I was just kidding really - for years, I had two classmates named Robert in my grade school days and then in my HS days, I had 2 other Parkers in my homeroom (they were brother and sister and I ended up sitting between them due to our first (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) I have a brother-in-law Bob, a cousin Bob, friends named Bob... almost as common as the Daves I know... I was going to use John Doe or Richard Roe, but somehow Snoopy-as-lawyer kept on running thru my head... Dave K (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Did you have to use "Bob"? It's not THAT common of a name, is it?... ;-) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) huh?? The analogy was as close to apt as I had the time to make--Eric (being Bob) had committed transgressions on LUGNET in the past for which he was 'officially' forgiven. Now smomeone maliciosly attacked Eric, and people have chimed in (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I wouldn't necessarily call my 'tirades' in this thread (and others) a form of 'community policing'. I was adhering to my personal sense of justice (much like Helo did last episode of BSG) and 'standing up' for what I perceived to be a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Hear! Hear! 'Nuff said (1) Dave K 1. adding to my repertoire of 'Dave-isms' (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Dave, Your analogy is incorrect. It would be correct if Bob had done something in another town and then someone in the town hall had abused Bob for his actions in the other town, Bob had defended himself, James had said Bob was reformed and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Really though John, for standing up for our friend, you are teh awesome too. (...) Again let us pause and wish him luck and good bricks where ever he may be. Let us keep warm the bosom that would warmly embrace him, should he be so inclined to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Fair enough. JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You got it. Well done. (...) That "incident", if you will, in my mind marks the time when he finally gave up on LUGNET, and so any ref to that is a sore spot for me; call it my personal "N word". When e invoked his name, I admit, I lost it. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) No it isn't, but it IS what makes me think he is still among the populus that reads Lugnet. And that is what you asked, isn't it? ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. (what you snipped: non sequitur) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
