Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:04:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8649 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Allister McLaren wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Allister McLaren wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sure I'll get a private email for Lar, or at least someone will, if he
> > > doesn't like anything I say about him here.
> >
> > Hello??? McLaren???? You are getting a public one right now.
>
> Hang on, isn't this usually the time for an oh so high-larious Monty Python
> quote, not Back To The Future?
>
> I'm not sure exactly what your problem is here, [John]. I bear no malice
> towards ++lar, and certainly didn't intend any in that message. I was merely
> laughing at the irony of how DaveK, someone I'm aware has been in stouches
> with ++lar in the past, particularly over 'community policing', seemed to be
> turning into that very same Community Policeman. It was a (non-malicious) jab
> at Dave, not ++lar. Dave took it with good humour, so again, what's your
> problem? Is it because {you} want to be the new ++lar?
>
> I hate having to explain jokes, but whateva, welcome to slow-class.
I wouldn't necessarily call my 'tirades' in this thread (and others) a form of
'community policing'. I was adhering to my personal sense of justice (much like
Helo did last episode of BSG) and 'standing up' for what I perceived to be a
transgression against a fellow LUGNETter. I would have (and probably will do
so) 'stood up' for anyone here, no matter who they are or what they may have
done in the past, if there was an injustice done to them.
It's who I am. It's who I've always been.
For a full sense of disclosure, I've met Eric once, at BF a few years back.
That's about it, really. It's not like he 'hangs out' in rtlT and we're
drinking buddies. And if (and when) he's wrong, or acting prickish, I'll call
him on it (I think I have in teh past, but again, too lazy to look things up).
As I expect people 'out there' would call me out if I'm doing same.
The personalities and opinions and everything else added in is fine and dandy
for the individual, but justice has to be equally applied to everyone. There
cannot be--how did Orwell put it--some that are 'more equal' than others. By
the same token, there cannot be those that are 'less equal' than others because
of past (and forgiven) misdeeds.
That's where I take my stance. That's where I pipe up.
And if I'm wrong--hey, I bet on the wrong 'underdog' and I'll take my medicine.
That's the 'community' part. We all have an equal voice here. That's one of
the best bits about LUGNET.
Anyway, I'd say more but, eh, whatever.... (1)
Dave K
-the list expands...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I never said it was a very good joke, nor necessarily accurate. When you mentioned community policing earlier in the thread, it just struck an ironic chord with me. ... (...) Well, at least someone's' taking this thread, and indeed Eric, (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Hang on, isn't this usually the time for an oh so high-larious Monty Python quote, not Back To The Future? I'm not sure exactly what your problem is here, John. I bear no malice towards ++lar, and certainly didn't intend any in that message. I (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
