To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53623 (-10)
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) Did you have to use "Bob"? It's not THAT common of a name, is it?... ;-) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) huh?? The analogy was as close to apt as I had the time to make--Eric (being Bob) had committed transgressions on LUGNET in the past for which he was 'officially' forgiven. Now smomeone maliciosly attacked Eric, and people have chimed in (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I wouldn't necessarily call my 'tirades' in this thread (and others) a form of 'community policing'. I was adhering to my personal sense of justice (much like Helo did last episode of BSG) and 'standing up' for what I perceived to be a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Hear! Hear! 'Nuff said (1) Dave K 1. adding to my repertoire of 'Dave-isms' (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) Dave, Your analogy is incorrect. It would be correct if Bob had done something in another town and then someone in the town hall had abused Bob for his actions in the other town, Bob had defended himself, James had said Bob was reformed and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Really though John, for standing up for our friend, you are teh awesome too. (...) Again let us pause and wish him luck and good bricks where ever he may be. Let us keep warm the bosom that would warmly embrace him, should he be so inclined to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Fair enough. JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) You got it. Well done. (...) That "incident", if you will, in my mind marks the time when he finally gave up on LUGNET, and so any ref to that is a sore spot for me; call it my personal "N word". When e invoked his name, I admit, I lost it. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) No it isn't, but it IS what makes me think he is still among the populus that reads Lugnet. And that is what you asked, isn't it? ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. (what you snipped: non sequitur) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR