 | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
|
In lugnet.pirates, Dave Schuler wrote: But check out the (...) Wow. I admit I haven't been following Best-Lock at all, but isn't this insanely close to copyright violation for the "likeness" of the minifig? Have their figs always been so (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | just a test
|
|
Well, we'll see if I have finally escaped my old email address. (20 years ago, 2-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Cobi/Best-Lock
|
|
Some of you may have noticed the semi-recent appearance of the brand Cobi/Best-Lock on shelves at nearby stores. Toys R Us is, so far, the largest carrier of the brand in the US, though at least one set has appeared at KB Toys, and an arm of the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-07, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gundam Mega Bloks questionnaire
|
|
(...) Thanks for the news, Jeff! I'm still lamenting the fact that we can't readily get these sets in the US, but it's greatly encouraging to see a discussion of future plans for the licensed product line. I don't make a habit of perusing Gundam (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Gundam Mega Bloks questionnaire
|
|
From Gunota Headlines Blog: Yet another Bandai merchandise questionnaire, this time on Gundam Perfect Web's Mega Bloks site ( (URL) ). Besides the usual set of questions, they ask what people want to see from the line in the future. Respondents can (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | dumdidum
|
|
test blabla (20 years ago, 29-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | K'Nex enters the fray
|
|
K'nex has started selling brick knex hybrid construction sets. They utilize a locking pin mechanism to join knex to plates and bricks (provided). The bricks are done on standard lego scale, and come in several forms not available from other (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) No doubt it's pleasant but it's a shipping container so it should be practical and is this unappealling ;) Tim (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote 3:2. I meant that 6:10 is just off the golden ratio of 6:9.7... Though I was confused there, you make the case that the aspect ratio is actually a pleasant one, as opposed to your initial (...) (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) actually 10:6 = 5:3 = 1.66 is closer to the golden mean (1.618...) than 3:2 = 1.5 ;) (...) Moved to .o-t.geek (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
{MERRY CHRISTMAS} Here's hoping you have a happy LEGO Christmas! Gary Istok ~ (URL) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Hello testing
|
|
(...) Testing my replies.... (20 years ago, 21-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron Firefox Extension (beta)
|
|
(...) There's a version 0.8? I can only find 0.6. BTW, FF 2.0 is out now, and it says the plugin is incompatible - I'm guessing it's just a version number change or something. ROSCO (20 years ago, 21-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron Firefox Extension (beta)
|
|
(...) Dan, FYI, version 0.8 worked fine on the test page using Firefox 1.5 on Linux (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060802 Mandriva/1.5.0.7-0.1.20060mdk (2006.0) Firefox/1.5.0.7. ) Thanks! A couple things I noticed: 1) (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
This is just a test (20 years ago, 19-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) LiveJournal, SourceForge, and the New York Times all do it correctly, just to name a few: (URL) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
|
(...) Actually, it's another of those words where common use has blurred what some would consider the correct usage. Many dictionaries now list it as a noun, eg: (URL) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
