 | | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) Um-- I wouldn't call them citizens, but yes, to protect the rights of people in general. (...) Are abortions legal 3 weeks prior to the due date? I didn't think that was allowed? You're right insofar as the line needs to be drawn. Otherwise, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) Oops—my bad. I misread you, and I see now that you were criticizing the choice to hold the "Screw Abstinence" event rather than condeming anyone. My apologies. (...) I beg your pardon, but the specific application of language is hardly using (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) For one thing I did not condemn them for supporting the choice of abortion. There is absolutely no condemnation there at all. As I stated I fully support legal abortion so I would be stupid to condemn someone who does so too. Your argument (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) But our government supports a system of protecting the rights of its citizens-- the real debate isn't whose choice it is, but rather whether or not the fetus has rights which need protecting by the government. Obviously, 1 second after birth (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
|
(...) If you took all clone purchasers and boiled them alive, TLG's competitors would go bankrupt and it would be good for AFOLs (assuming what's good for TLG is good for AFOLs). I just said that, but do I actually advocate it? Of course not. But it (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) Again, your selection of words is questionable. NARAL supports a system that allows for reproductive choice. It's true that choice may allow for abortion, but it also allows for non-abortion; why do you condemn NARAL for one avenue of choice (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: perl file copy question
|
|
(...) Yes, it returns a list of filename strings, including any relative path. ROSCO (21 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: perl file copy question
|
|
(...) Does this code help? It shows the outputs. Decided to have a fiddle with what Ross posted to see what everything did. Tim use File::Glob ':glob'; use File::Basename; $ddn="destination directory"; @t=(<g:/docs/in_prog...bes/*.*>); foreach $f (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: perl file copy question
|
|
(...) that does help! (meanwhile I got a version working that uses system(), just as a stopgap...) However I really don't want to use system() (or any process spawning things) and since I want to wildcard aren't I going to have to use glob() to get (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
|
(...) By supporting a system which allows for abortion I would argue that they are indeed supporting abortion. The whole pro-choice/pro-life facade is just emotional manipulation. One group believe that abortion is immoral, the other group believe (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
