Subject:
|
Re: $2,137.00
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:55:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1310 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Some people don't like "waiting until the last minute", calling it
"sniping". But I do it all the time, it keeps other people from emotionally
trying to top what I realistically consider a good price.
In lugnet.lego.direct, William R. Ward writes:
> "Pedro Silva" <el_gordo@netc.pt> writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
> > > If you look carefully, you will see that the higher bids are older, and
> > > thus were "proxy" bids (where you bid what you really think you want to
> > > pay for the item, then the system submits the lowest possible bid for
> > > you, and then automatically ups your bid as people come along later and
> > > attempt to outbid you). [...]
> > > Now I have upped my bid even when I do hold the high bid, when I decide
> > > my current high bid isn't really the highest I'm willing to bid.
> >
> > Most convenient, the whole system. Does it work as intended, never creating
> > any sort of issues?
>
> It tends to drive up the final price, in my opinion. I think it's
> better to wait until the last minute (or in some cases, the last 10
> seconds) of an auction before submitting your true highest bid...
>
> --Bill.
>
> XFUT: lugnet.market.theory
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Too much stress. I just "bid and forget" most of the time... I just place my bid & forget all about it. If I win, I get a little e-mail from ebay a few days later. Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthurs Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) Yes. I feel sniping is a valid technique although I don't do it myself. I think sniping really is just a way to keep your bid secret, even the fact that you plan to bid... and a way to keep your bid lower than if you started early. And if you (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) I completely agree...it is a bit underhanded, but how else are you going to win the bid at a "fair" price. I also agree with the assessment that proxy voting does tend to drive up the price quickly, and you end up paying more than you really (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: $2,137.00
|
| (...) [...] (...) It tends to drive up the final price, in my opinion. I think it's better to wait until the last minute (or in some cases, the last 10 seconds) of an auction before submitting your true highest bid... --Bill. XFUT: (...) (22 years ago, 13-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![$2,137.00 -Drew Croke (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Ray Sanders (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Richard Marchetti (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Larry Pieniazek (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Richard Marchetti (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Pedro Silva (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -John Henry Kruer (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Pedro Silva (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Rob Doucette (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Frank Filz (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Pedro Silva (12-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -William R. Ward (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Scott Arthur (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Larry Pieniazek (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Benjamin Medinets (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Frank Filz (14-Apr-02 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Larry Pieniazek (14-Apr-02 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: $2,137.00 -Larry Pieniazek (13-Apr-02 to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|