 | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) By me? Not that many. You could look it up. (...) Not by choice. Trademark law is clear on the point, which you, as a CEO, should know. If we want to protect our trademark (and we do, we've all put a lot into the concept and it has value as a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Well duh. That's the first time I've said (tm) after LEGO in a long long time. YCLIU. It, of course, should be LEGO(r). Proving my point about inadvertant vs. deliberate. (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) This would be a good example: (URL) - No "(r)" Guild of Bricksmiths - No "(TM)" LUGNET - No "(TM)" Refering to the Guild of Bricksmiths(TM) as simply "the Guild" Surly another case of: "do as I say, not as I do"! ;) Scott A (...) FUT : (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Was this a constructive post Scott? I remember you once asserting that your posts outside of l.o-t.d were always constructive. Chris (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | constructive posts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I doubt I said "always"? I would also suggest you read the context to my comment, where KW was able to show a little humility in his response: (URL) we agree that hypocrites chastising people for writing “Lego” rather than “LEGO(r)” would (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: constructive posts —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Written in .debate: "when I post outside this group I try to be 100% constructive. I have to be..." You didn't use the word always, you used 100%. And, to be fair, you said you try. So are you asserting that this was constructive or that you (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: constructive posts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I would assert that I made that clear in my last post to you? (...) I would agree that it would not be constructive if I were to bait Larry. Read the thread again and think about who is doing the baiting. (...) These "remember to dot your eyes (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Doyle Nelson
|
| | | | | (...) True, as you said below, larger companies sometime respond different than those who MUST protect their trademark to vulnerability. (...) "And our trademark is a lot more fragile than LEGO(tm), since we're a lot smaller." LP Well said. :-) I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hardly... that list is confined to the temper tantrum-ers and to those twits that, hardly ever honoring something themselves, dig up instances of where someone slipped up and dance around gleefully, as if that somehow proved anything other (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) All it "proves" is that people in glass houses should not throw stones. I would suggest that the post I referred to was more habitual than a slip. I would suggest that one could easy find a few hundred instances where you had “slipped up” in (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Brian Kasprzyk
|
| | | | | | (...) Interesting that you would call it a 'temper tantrum' without even knowing me. My whole point was simply to point out that many of us out here on Lugnet(tm) ;-) are tired of Larry and his 'know it all attitude' and personal way of always (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) He was echoing the sentiment I expressed, I think. And when you look at your initial words (which I left, for reference while snipping all else away) on this topic, I think it was a fair sentiment. Stamping your foot and saying "so sue me" (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Doyle Nelson
|
| | | | (...) True, as you said below, larger companies sometime respond different than those who MUST protect their trademark to vulnerability. (...) "And our trademark is a lot more fragile than LEGO(tm), since we're a lot smaller." LP Well said. :-) I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
