Subject:
|
Re: Small annoyance with seller
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 04:51:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
712 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I care. This particular transaction I think I would have paid 19, eyes open,
> for the part you spurned, but then it's just about the only part MY yellow
> castle is missing. But note... eyes open. I'd have been as miffed about
> chewed as you are if I didn't know.
Keep in mind that the black visor was the only part I wanted, so since it
was not in very good shape I wasted my whole effort in buying this figure.
I get the idea that finding this one element in near mint-mint condition is
going to be no easy task. This one element is in the category of "I think I
need this for Castle Blacktron" but who knows if I'll actually use it? I see
it on a black helmet for my character Surt.
Ah well...
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Small annoyance with seller
|
| (...) Yep, I think you put your finger on it. I think you have a beef (although, as you say in the subject, a "small" one) all right. Communication wasn't did. (...) Oooh, I will have to watch for *that* boilerplate because *mine* says buyer pays (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
