 | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) Real world ethics debate aside, does Lego-Distribution have to be so heavily tied to the real-world and the evolved Capitalism that we know today? If we can think of a fairer system for Lego, then why isn't that desirable? Richard (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | If there is no benefit to sellers, who is going to participate? You can set up whatever scheme you want but unless there is motivation, you're going to have a lot of buyers but no sellers. I know I certainly would not sell for less than the most the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | (...) This is true, which is why I think a statutory 5-10% profit should be standard on such a system. That way sellers won't lose money, but they also won't feel guilty or profiteering by making a small amount. The way the proposed system works is (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) Who says 5-10% profit is even WORTH doing anything? So I'm supposed to buy $500 worth of closeout Lego after Christmas, spend literally weeks sorting it with my wife, then auction off the bulk of the parts I don't need for a lousy 5%? I'd have (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | | | (...) It would be your choice, and no-one would pass judgement upon you either way. I don't think that both systems are mutually exclusive, and I think each has its uses. (...) The names that I know probably make profit, but I don't believe that (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | | In article <YZzdNx2DUuvsNBNRZYL...@4ax.com>, Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> writes (...) The New Lego Order - This millennium Lugnet, next millennium the world! A thousand years of fair-play! (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Maybe I'm just on a different wavelength here, but I don't understand this desire to disassociate one part of our lives from reality. I work hard every day in the real world. I pay for goods and services in the real world. I earn a wage in the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | I know some of what I'm going to say has been said before, but I say it again just to re-iterate. First: Only a small number of sets fit into the "so highly desired" that their price gets ridiculous. Very few are irreplaceable (ok, so the Metroliner (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | In lugnet.market.theory, Frank Filz writes: <snipped lots of good points> Your arguments are pretty convincing - maybe now isn't a time in which we need a different system. Maybe we never will! But thanks to everyone who listened to my ponderings :) (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
