 | | Re: Bad news for TRU —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) As a heavy user, the modern library is where it is at. I can now usually download obscure journal papers in seconds rather than waiting a couple of weeks for hard copies to appear (usually it would be a "dud", or I had moved on since then.) I (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Paul Ferguson
|
| | | | | In lugnet.market.shopping, Scott Arthur writes: (snip of message which led to Scott Arthur's response) (...) My experience is that all of this is PARTLY true. On the good side, as Scott suggests, you can often get articles from journals which (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | (...) Paul--you may wish to check JSTOR ((URL) if memory serves) for older articles. Your library needs to be a subscriber, and they should have a connection through their Library homepage. There are fewer journals than you'll find in ProQuest, but (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) You are 100% correct (~ '88 is the best we get). For my field that is not all that much of an issue - but for others it will be important. Indecently, I work quite closely with the facility mangers at the National Archives of Scotland, they (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Paul Ferguson
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Register House in 1980-81 and again in 1987-88, trying not to put too much additional wear on documents from this period. Also lots of time nearby at the National Library of Scotland. Of course, troublemakers like me want to ensure that you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) The first time I was in the building we work with (the main document repository on the edge of town) we got the grand tour. In the restoration room a guy was restoring the very things you are talking about - the lead on the seals attacks the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Paul Ferguson
|
| | | | | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: (snip) (...) This is interesting. I've seen lead seals that were cracked, apparently just by rough handling over the last 700 years, but the only problems I've seen with the cords that attach them to (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I think the cords I seen were faded red. Th guy called them "papal bulls"? (...) The building is called Thomas Thomson House. It uses a siphonic roof drainage system{1}. We study these things for various reasons, and the facility manger has (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Paul Ferguson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) P.S. Scott, I hope that you meant to say "incidentally!" Not taking indecent liberties with the NAS staff, are we? I suppose that WOULD require working closely. (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Floydian slip… ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Floydian slips (Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Should be Freudian Slip. I had just been enjoying the Floydian slip web site: (URL) was lucky enough to get Echoes from Santa, and I have been slowly rediscovering my Floyd CD's. Right now, I can’t get past Comfortably Numb on the Pulse album. (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | Alas for "dead storage". Do less people browse now? There is nothing like flipping through the card catalog just to discover the breadth and depth of what exists. There is nothing like wandering the stacks and discovering that your library posesses (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Modern Libraries (was Re: Bad news for TRU) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I liked RPI's online card catalog. The nicest part was you could log in remotely and use it. It also had an extremely nice search engine, where you could expand and shrink your search. I never tested it for how complete the coverage was, and I (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Article quoting (was: Bad news for TRU) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Scott, is there any reason you continue to quote entire messages in order to reply to a single paragraph? ROSCO Sent to .debate - because there isn't a .off-topic.questions (22 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Article quoting (was: Bad news for TRU) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Yes : (URL) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Article quoting (was: Bad news for TRU) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) quoting what's relevant to the reply and quoting the whole post. ROSCO (22 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
