Subject:
|
Re: Box-4-Blox(tm)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shopping
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:25:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
913 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Kerry Raymond writes:
> Personally I've never bothered with one. Partly because I don't find
> sorting by
> hand that big a deal. When I pull a model apart, I tend to put each piece as I
> remove it into piles based on loose classification (i.e. a rough sort)
> and then
> I fine-sort each pile into their respective bins, bags, tubs for permanent
> storage etc. Partly because my final storage system is based around type of
> part primarily (brick, plate, slope, etc) with size of part a secondary
> consideration.
Me too, I feel the same way you do, except for bulk bricks. Since I have
over 70 3033s worth of bulk, most of which is unsorted, (but still in the
individual bags) I can see where a first pass sort using these might save me
a fair bit of time, dump out all of one type of bag across all the bins,
feed a few at a time in, and things are at least partly sorted. Or maybe not.
I also have a lot of other sets where I have multiple copies and a first
pass may be helpful, I still have 50 siths to sort at the moment...
As you say, I've given it a go, and should have them in a week and we shall
see...
Thanks all!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Box-4-Blox(tm)
|
| (...) I've seen them in lots of homes here in Oz where there are small children and Lego, so they certainly sell well. As you can probably see from the WWW page, the boxes are basically designed to do a coarse sort by part size by a sieving (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
