Subject:
|
Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shipping
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:57:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3282 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I am currently pursuing a claim for a LEGO set (a 7127) which was (somewhat)
crushed during international shipping. This question was asked of me by the
postmaster where I am attempting to file a claim. I was left with the impression
that being a 'collectable' might make the claim more likely to be paid, but I
have no idea. How and when is something considered 'a collectable' ? And how do
I go about explaining to the Post Office why a LEGO set in a sealed good box is
worth more than a LEGO set in a sealed but crushed box ?
Ray
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? -Larry Pieniazek (24-Aug-04 to lugnet.market.shipping)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? -David Laswell (24-Aug-04 to lugnet.market.shipping)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? -Ray Sanders (24-Aug-04 to lugnet.market.shipping)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is LEGO considered a 'collectable' for insurance claims ? -David Laswell (25-Aug-04 to lugnet.market.shipping, lugnet.market.appraisal)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|