| | Re: Lost parts during shipping Greg Perry
|
| | (...) I haven't had problems with receiving Lego items in envelopes - the few order's I've received have been in padded envelopes that didn't get (too) mangled by the USPS. I do remember one particularly horrible shipment I received in a Priority (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Lost parts during shipping James Brink
|
| | | | (...) I haven't had problems with padded envelopes or priority mail boxes yet, just regular envelopes. Some had added padding arround the items and others did not. I wonder if they treat padded envelopes differently than those just appearing to be a (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lost parts during shipping Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure what thickness they try and run through the automatic machines, but that's one place damage can occur. When I ship I try to: - bag everything - put a complete address label in every bag (so there has to be a double packaging (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lost parts during shipping Troy Cefaratti
|
| | | | (...) others (...) just (...) I believe that anything under 1/4 inch is sent through the sorting machines. Regular envelopes with Lego in them would cause a problem for the machines becuase they are not uniform in thickness. The "bump" in the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lost parts during shipping James Seibert
|
| | | | "Troy's Surplus Lego" <legosales@tcphoto.net> wrote in message news:H9Jy07.3u7@lugnet.com... (...) machines. (...) where (...) Packages are packed into bulk mail containers weighing up to 2000 pounds, so if you are unlucky, your package may end up (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| | | | |