 | | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) It could be considered that, but I don't find this type of thing of any great importance. Ebay allows a certain number of characters for the auction title and this seller was just a bit creative. What I want to know from you is WHY are you (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Does TLC act when we point out infringements of their trademark here?
|
|
(...) The case of the bootleg-clone seller may be instructive here. I don't know why he was suspended/de-registered, but given that we know TLC members read LUGNET off and on, is it at all possible that when we flag these questionable uses of (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) Well, that one I'll concede. I suppose it's possible that there are indeed "Legos" in the lot, but you're right that the description should reflect that. (...) I suppose Ebay has some kind of complaint department, but my at-home Internet (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) Yes, yes, yes, but what about this: (URL) title is 70's Sears Brix Blox 900 Piece Set Lego Legos lego is not mentioned in the description. This is annyoing, and is keyword spamming. Were do we complain about this? John Kruer (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
Would this count as keyword spamming? (URL) is 5382, aquazone accesory pack. The title is Lego 5382 Aquazone Minifigs Town City Space obviesly this has nothing to do with town, city, or space. I found it on a search for 'lego space.'He does not (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) That's news to me, I'm afraid, and I think in practice it's nothing more than Ebay's effort to divorce itself from liability re: trademark representation. Could Ebay even enforce this policy if they wanted to? Hypothetically--if you came into (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) This is not, however, how Ebay defines key word spamming. (URL) particular, Extra Brand Names in Title. Any use of a trademarked (brand) name in the title of a listing where products of that brand name are not being offered. And, very (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) Darn you, Dave! I clicked on this message EXPECTING to see something about Eminem and Tony Hawk Amidala (whoever that would be) and instead found out I was callously and horribly misled. You terrible rogue! (yes, I'm being silly.) LFB (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) But it's not "key word spamming," since the product is, after all, "LEGO-compatible," and that's one of its intended selling points. Why would it be any different to describe a LEGO lot as "Red Bricks," since both "red" and "brick" could be (...) (22 years ago, 20-May-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego" from China Sets?????
|
|
(...) They are also in blatant violation of Ebay's policies against key word spamming and requiring listing items in the proper category. Has anyone successfully complained to Ebay about this? After all, those policies are in their interest, quite (...) (22 years ago, 19-May-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
(...) Sorry, I've made a false interpretation here. I should have read (and quoted) the full tekst of that particular item more carefully: "Beginning 3/21/02, the fee structure for international transactions will be changed. International buyers (...) (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
(...) I must admit they have not stated that very clearly everywhere. When I look at Paypal fees table: (URL) tells me that recieving funds to a personal account is free, and the asterix footnote directly behind item stating the recieving fees for a (...) (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
(...) Cool! Thanks for that update! The new 1% exchange fee still applies though, right? (for international funds transfers) (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
(...) The nearest thing to this that I could find is: (URL) currently says Germany and the Netherlands. The $1.00 fee mentioned here is a fee Paypal charges the account holder every time he orders a bank transfer to fund his Paypal account. With (...) (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
(...) Thanks for the update, this is handy info! Does anyone know if PayPal has a single list (URL reference?) of countries which allow bank transfers? -Rob. (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Bank transfer funded Paypal payments now possible for Dutch clients.
|
|
Hello all, This may be of importance for anyone selling to Dutch clients and being payed through Paypal. Today I've recieved a message from Paypal, that from now on they allow Dutch users to fund their Paypal account with a transfer from a Dutch (...) (22 years ago, 18-May-02, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Paypal's security certifica has expired
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I just visited Paypal on a PC with newly installed Windows, and got the same problem. The actual problem relates to Verisign's cert - it expires 25 oct 2011, but it's parent CA cert expires 8 jan 2004. Wonder if Verisign knows this? As (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: MasterCard users may not be able to use PayPal
|
|
(...) many internet businesses actually are -- and there is no doubt that Paypal ranks high in this category. Still, there is a convenience factor to be considered, esp. with international brick dealers. Prior to knowing any of this, I reflexively (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | MasterCard users may not be able to use PayPal
|
|
From this USA Today story (URL) new rule by MasterCard could crimp online commerce by stopping merchants from accepting credit card payments through third parties, such as the popular PayPal" "The reason for the change, says MasterCard spokesman (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.services)
|
