 | | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
(...) I guess that's up for discussion. It'll depend largely on how Larry decides to partition the initial collection of stuff. (...) I think it's likely that rules will evolve over time, but I'd rather not get too involved. Right now, from my point (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | New group...moving forward?
|
|
Hi all, It's great that we have a group for this now. So, what's happening with the jambalaya box(es) now? Is there a box of windows being sent out? Are there rules? Is this supposed to be about boxes started only by Todd and Suz? Could I just start (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
Well, I'm interested in participating in the box(es) trades I would put in blocks of a type similar to what I took out.... Paul Sinasohn 5571 and 8280 arrived today!!! Fun! (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
(...) I also wrote (on 10 July in lugnet.general): (...) Any thoughts? Todd, did you have any assumptions about this as the idea's originator? (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
(...) Anarchy, I suppose, unless/until someone wants to orchestrate things in a more coherent manner. Certainly the newsgroup could be used for coming up with rules and regulations, etc., as well as regular talk about what sorts of things people (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
My two cents: Someone at some point mentioned the idea of people itemizing what they took out and put into a box. I definitely think that should be optional. Or that there should be an anonymous jambalaya or 2. People should definitely play fair by (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
(...) I ought to clarify that a bit -- I'm not offering to write anything to handle this _yet_. I think later it will all fit in nicely with the rest of the infrastructure. (I just can't make it a priority anytime relatively soon.) Having multiple (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
|
(...) I should clarify that bit too -- by "let go" I mean not staying closely involved with the evolving rules and day-to-day interactions. Since it's got so much potential to evolve into many different types of packages and rule-sets, I'd rather (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
